Search Engine Watch
SEO News

Go Back   Search Engine Watch Forums > Search Engines & Directories > Other Search Engines & Directories > AOL Search
FAQ Members List Calendar Forum Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Thread Tools
Old 10-25-2010   #1
Jerry Nordstrom
Discovery's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,029
Discovery has much to be proud ofDiscovery has much to be proud ofDiscovery has much to be proud ofDiscovery has much to be proud ofDiscovery has much to be proud ofDiscovery has much to be proud ofDiscovery has much to be proud ofDiscovery has much to be proud ofDiscovery has much to be proud ofDiscovery has much to be proud of
AOL updated interface same bad results

AOL has rebranded their 20 armed monster formerly known as Quigo, Adsonar, and more.

They added a number of desperately needed features to the online app including the ability to Geo target your ads.

Creating and managing ads is still a nightmare that can only be done via a spreadsheet and help to upload from an account representative.

We had a great deal of success with Adsonar/Quigo in 2008 and 2009. Even shifting some of our budget away from Google to this platform. Much of the success was due to a few premium properties.

AOL home page
AOL finance Homepage
AOL Personal Finance Homepage

Unfortunately these pages were removed from their offerings and we were left with testing out their other properties.

After a few thousand dollars almost 8,000 clicks we had a 100 or less conversions nearly all of which were bogus. The secondary properties were worthless. The main reason is AOL had allowed so many poor advertisers to run ads... Million dollar mirical job, Mom discovers teeth whitening solution for a dollar you know the type. It is an assumption, however we are fairly certain that as soon as our ads ran in a premium spot, we were hammered with clicks from the competition. With no help at Adsonar we dropped the campaigns altogether.

In October of this year we leared AOL had taken over the platform, cleaned up the app, had added the GEO targeting and raised their editorial standards. They would no longer allow the bottom feader ads.

We tried it again with a very small test.
200 clicks on 7 placements
We had 0 conversions.
Avg page views 1
Avg time on site under 2 seconds
Avg bounce rate 99.8%

So the results tell it all.
If you are considering using AOL or I would tell you not to. If you decide to anyhow, be weary and run SMALL tests and grow in small increments.

Did you have any positive experiences with AOL adverstising?
Discovery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2010   #2
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 314
SEORockStar is on a distinguished road
Re: AOL updated interface same bad results

Even I don't see any improvements in as well I am least bothered about this crap Search engine
SEORockStar is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Do keywords in URL influence your rank? Research by Web CEO Team. Web CEO Team Search Technology & Relevancy 51 06-24-2008 10:16 PM
google.COM results vary by searcher IP helen Google Web Search 4 08-23-2006 10:56 AM
Google Preferences - Interface Language: change my search results dramatically! mdf Multilingual Search Markets & Non-US Engines 14 02-28-2006 09:40 PM
Is Google Inserting Paid Results into Natural Results? NTR Other Google Issues 2 09-04-2005 11:30 PM
Session Four: Day One: Vertical Creep Into Regular Search Results Robert_Charlton SEM Related Organizations & Events 1 08-14-2005 05:38 AM