Go Back   Search Engine Watch Forums > Search Engine Marketing Strategies > Search Engine Optimization


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-16-2004
McFox McFox is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: sunny Scotland
Posts: 20
McFox is on a distinguished road
Spamming anchor-text links via blogger

I came across someone who is spamming blogger.com.

In a period of some two weeks, this person has created 42 seperate blogs and has dumped over 6000 anchor-text links to a variety of websites wihtin the blogs, obviously in a bid to manipulate rankings.

Does anyone know if this is a wasted exercise or will the value of the spam links over-inflate the inbound links as intended?

Is there any way to penalize the process?

McF

Last edited by dannysullivan : 10-17-2004 at 07:48 AM. Reason: removed actual site, as not necessary for the discussion
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-17-2004
sugarrae sugarrae is offline
I Should Be Working
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: In front of the computer.
Posts: 116
sugarrae has a spectacular aura aboutsugarrae has a spectacular aura aboutsugarrae has a spectacular aura about
Blogger gives out subdomains to bloggers and these domains will carry little value unless they are built up themselves - and in addition, blog links seem to have been devalued a bit from what I've been seeing. Though the inbound anchor text will still count a bit IME.

He wouldn't likely get penalized in the serps (for the domains being linked to) under a logical thought process or else people would do this every day and link to their competitors. However, I'm sure this is somehow against bloggers TOS and the blogs would probably be pulled if found.

I think the best way to impose a "penalty" on this SEO yourself is to simply create yourself some links of medium and high value rather than spend hours researching his links of low value. But, then again, I'm kind of a "live and let live" person when it comes to SEO.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-17-2004
rustybrick's Avatar
rustybrick rustybrick is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 2,803
rustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud of
Not sure why he would go the blogger route to do this.

Stupid, IMO.

Well, I would never do this any way, blogger.com or mydomain.com.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-17-2004
seobook seobook is offline
I'm blogging this
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: we are Penn State!
Posts: 1,943
seobook is a name known to allseobook is a name known to allseobook is a name known to allseobook is a name known to allseobook is a name known to allseobook is a name known to all
to call it stupid is to call all seo stupid...if it works then somebody will do it.

I bet it is somewhat easier to fly below radar by spamming other blogs into a fake blog that at least temporarily looks real and then parsing that link pop out to your real sites...plus that way there is not as much risk of damaging your brand or bloggers coming after you to attack your server.

if you were too high profile with the idea though it would be a cheap and easy way to give google a roadmap to your sites which may deserve a penalty of some sort.
__________________
The SEO Book
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-17-2004
rustybrick's Avatar
rustybrick rustybrick is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 2,803
rustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud of
seobook, let's look in hindsight (I know we are not there yet). But let's try and look. What do you see? I think I saw this exact thread not only in this forum, but in two others. ahemm...

Oh, you're right. I should not use the word 'stupid'. I am sorry for that.

Last edited by rustybrick : 10-17-2004 at 08:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-18-2004
I, Brian I, Brian is offline
Whitehat on...Whitehat off...Whitehat on...Whitehat off...
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Scotland
Posts: 942
I, Brian is a glorious beacon of lightI, Brian is a glorious beacon of lightI, Brian is a glorious beacon of lightI, Brian is a glorious beacon of lightI, Brian is a glorious beacon of light
Quote:
Originally Posted by McFox
I came across someone who is spamming blogger.com.

In a period of some two weeks, this person has created 42 seperate blogs and has dumped over 6000 anchor-text links to a variety of websites wihtin the blogs, obviously in a bid to manipulate rankings.

Does anyone know if this is a wasted exercise or will the value of the spam links over-inflate the inbound links as intended?

Is there any way to penalize the process?

McF
Using blogs in this way is an old SEO tactic - but using a high profile site like Blogger in this way is disingenius - not only might Blogger take offence and remove all that hard work, but Blogger is also owned by Google and so there's room for communication about "offensive" use of Blogger by the registrant.

The "penalty" simply comes from the fact that all 42 blogs would then require promoting - a bit of link-spamming in other blogs, no doubt - but getting a more natural linkage would be more difficult.

And if the "offfending" blogs are removed, then the backlink building to them is effectively wasted.

At the heart of it is the problem that Google seems to have (or until recently, had) a clear bias towards blogs. Somehow, the idea that Blogs are mostly content rich, has been a keen mistake, in my opinion. Forums can also be content rich - but they have already seen devaluation.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:55 PM.