Search Engine Watch
SEO News

 


Go Back   Search Engine Watch Forums > Search Engines & Directories > Google > Google Web Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-08-2004
inlogicalbearer inlogicalbearer is offline
SEO and Marketing News from North
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 66
inlogicalbearer is on a distinguished road
Why Does The Google Client Parameter Give Less Results?

When you use Firefox search box, Google add the "&client=firefox-a" to the URL and it display a lot less results. For the word "the" you got 2,5 billions results and if you erase the parameter you jump to 5,9 billions !!!
It does the same if any string is after the &client=. Why ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-08-2004
Mel Mel is offline
Just the facts ma'm
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 793
Mel is just really niceMel is just really niceMel is just really niceMel is just really nice
I am running Firefox 1.0PR and do not see those results at all.
I am seeing:
Quote:
Results 1 - 10 of about 5,840,000,000 for "the"
with a search url of:
http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...-8&q=%22the%22

Have you by any chance changed the user agent in your browser?
__________________
Mel Nelson
Expert SEO Dont settle for average SEO
Singapore Search Engine Optimization and web design
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-09-2004
inlogicalbearer inlogicalbearer is offline
SEO and Marketing News from North
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 66
inlogicalbearer is on a distinguished road
I got also 1.0 pr Mel, but when using the right search box it add those parameters to my url
http://www.google.com/search?q=the&c...en-US:official and I got less results ? Weird !
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-11-2004
dannysullivan dannysullivan is offline
Editor, SearchEngineLand.com (Info, Great Columns & Daily Recap Of Search News!)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Search Engine Land
Posts: 2,091
dannysullivan has much to be proud ofdannysullivan has much to be proud ofdannysullivan has much to be proud ofdannysullivan has much to be proud ofdannysullivan has much to be proud ofdannysullivan has much to be proud ofdannysullivan has much to be proud ofdannysullivan has much to be proud of
Great find! It doesn't look like a Firefox thing. Instead, it seems like ANY client parameter will make the count decrease. I've blogged more about this here: Client Parameter Makes Google Report Fewer Matches
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-11-2004
rustybrick's Avatar
rustybrick rustybrick is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 2,823
rustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud of
Just to clarify, I believe this was first found at WebmasterWorld at this thread http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum3/26116.htm

Just making sure credit goes to those who found it.

I found it very neat as well and blogged on it as well.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-11-2004
inlogicalbearer inlogicalbearer is offline
SEO and Marketing News from North
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 66
inlogicalbearer is on a distinguished road
Some other search sites using Google got thoses &client parameter. If you go to La Toile du Québec and select the Google query you will see &client=netgraphe in the URL. Netgraphe is the name of the company who own www.Toile.com
http://google.canoe.com/toile/index....gorie=&ad=w5n2
&client=netgraphe&ie=latin1&oe=latin1
&output=xml_no_dtd
&ip=&userid=netgraphe
&start=0&num=20&lr=&query=car&x=31&y=7

I'm suspecting Google give different "view" to outsiders request to his database. Go look any site with the AdSense Google search box. You will have the same number of results using it or using the &client parameter. It's also like the Google API, you will have differents results, and less, using it if you compare to normal use of Google.

Last edited by dannysullivan : 10-11-2004 at 12:36 PM. Reason: fixed wrapping problem
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-11-2004
dannysullivan dannysullivan is offline
Editor, SearchEngineLand.com (Info, Great Columns & Daily Recap Of Search News!)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Search Engine Land
Posts: 2,091
dannysullivan has much to be proud ofdannysullivan has much to be proud ofdannysullivan has much to be proud ofdannysullivan has much to be proud ofdannysullivan has much to be proud ofdannysullivan has much to be proud ofdannysullivan has much to be proud ofdannysullivan has much to be proud of
Yeah, Barry -- saw your post after I did mind, followed through to the WW thread and very good. Gary had also pointed out to me some issues of a9 showing the same thing. In short, client seems to equal Google partner, not browser client -- and I wonder if Firefox simply made a mistake in using the wrong parameter. I added a postscript explaining this more to my blog post.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-11-2004
rustybrick's Avatar
rustybrick rustybrick is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 2,823
rustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud of
Yea, funny how these things come about. Hype, Hype, Hype and then, oh it was just a parameter used for this case. So firefox is to blame for misuse of the parameter. Interesting find, nonetheless.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-11-2004
Dodger's Avatar
Dodger Dodger is offline
Honorary Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Central US
Posts: 349
Dodger has a spectacular aura aboutDodger has a spectacular aura aboutDodger has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by rustybrick
Yea, funny how these things come about. Hype, Hype, Hype and then, oh it was just a parameter used for this case. So firefox is to blame for misuse of the parameter. Interesting find, nonetheless.
Misuse? Why do you say that Barry?

In order for it to be a misuse of this parameter, they would had to have that parameter set to "firefox-a" for some other purpose wouldn't they? I cannot think of anything they have that would be using that parameter right off-hand.
__________________
I am Ronnie
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-11-2004
rustybrick's Avatar
rustybrick rustybrick is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 2,823
rustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud of
Dodger,

I think its misused because they have no reason to include such a parameter. Doing so limits the results of the search from the default search parameters. Maybe it was an oversight? Maybe I don't fully understand it?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-11-2004
Dodger's Avatar
Dodger Dodger is offline
Honorary Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Central US
Posts: 349
Dodger has a spectacular aura aboutDodger has a spectacular aura aboutDodger has a spectacular aura about
Okay, sounds good.

What interested me the most about this though, is the Client ID itself -- firefox-a. I could understand just firefox, if it were being misused as a browser client ID.

The -a on the end of it is what has me thinking that this was actually assigned to Mozilla at one time or another by Google. They did not pull this out of the air, in other words.
__________________
I am Ronnie
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-12-2004
Dodger's Avatar
Dodger Dodger is offline
Honorary Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Central US
Posts: 349
Dodger has a spectacular aura aboutDodger has a spectacular aura aboutDodger has a spectacular aura about
The folks at MozillaZine (actually a whole lot of 'em) saw my blog entry about this and are working on a fix for it -- I think it is more like a work-around. They are not happy with that little search box returning half as many results.

They do not know where or how the client ID is getting injected into the URL. Keep mentioning a google.src file, but they cannot see the client-id inside of it.
__________________
I am Ronnie
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-12-2004
Dodger's Avatar
Dodger Dodger is offline
Honorary Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Central US
Posts: 349
Dodger has a spectacular aura aboutDodger has a spectacular aura aboutDodger has a spectacular aura about
Boy that was quick. No sooner did I come over here and post and checked back there -- somebody had an answer.

The google.src was written (or provided) by someone at Google (according to the poster). Removing the following line of code from your google.src file will stop the search box from injecting the client parameter in the url:

Code:
<input name="sourceid" value="mozilla-search">
The google.src file is located in the searchplugins directory inside of the application directory.

.
__________________
I am Ronnie
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-12-2004
rustybrick's Avatar
rustybrick rustybrick is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 2,823
rustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud ofrustybrick has much to be proud of
Nice work Dodger!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-12-2004
inlogicalbearer inlogicalbearer is offline
SEO and Marketing News from North
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 66
inlogicalbearer is on a distinguished road
Not working for me Dodger. Or half way. I don't have that particular line in mine and I try to remove this

Quote:
update="http://www.google.com/mozilla/google.src"
updateCheckDays=1
queryEncoding="utf-8"
queryCharset="utf-8"
... and not work

But when I remove thoses ...

Quote:
<inputnext name="start" factor="10">
<inputprev name="start" factor="10">
<input name="ie" value="utf-8">
<input name="oe" value="utf-8">
...It stop writing thoses last parameters in my URL

Last edited by inlogicalbearer : 10-12-2004 at 08:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-12-2004
Dodger's Avatar
Dodger Dodger is offline
Honorary Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Central US
Posts: 349
Dodger has a spectacular aura aboutDodger has a spectacular aura aboutDodger has a spectacular aura about
I don't have it in mine either. Here is the code in that file on mine (note the email address on the first line too)

Code:
# Mozilla/Google plug-in by amitp+mozilla@google.com

<search 
   name="Google"
   description="Google Search"
   method="GET"
   action="http://www.google.com/search"
   update="http://www.google.com/mozilla/google.src"
   updateCheckDays=1   
   queryEncoding="utf-8"
   queryCharset="utf-8"
>

<input name="q" user>
<inputnext name="start" factor="10">
<inputprev name="start" factor="10">
<input name="ie" value="utf-8">
<input name="oe" value="utf-8">

<interpret 
    browserResultType="result" 
    charset = "UTF-8"
    resultListStart="<!--a-->" 
    resultListEnd="<!--z-->" 
    resultItemStart="<!--m-->" 
    resultItemEnd="<!--n-->"
>
</search>
I would not remove any of the other lines inlogicalbearer. This file is like a template for the URL string that gets sent to Google.

There are different builds in Firefox, and I am wondering if that might have something to do with it. I am thinking that the string for the client-id is listed somewhere else, maybe hard coded into a binary file.
__________________
I am Ronnie
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-01-2005
Gerben Abbink
 
Posts: n/a
similar problem with hl parameter

when searching for 'xml editor' with parameter hl='en' our website, www.xmlblueprint.com, ranks on page 3 (position 24), but with parameter hl='nl' (language: Dutch) the website ranks on page 2 (position 13). Mind, i'm not searching for Dutch websites and our website is in English.
It seems Google dislikes European websites?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-01-2005
Marcia's Avatar
Marcia Marcia is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 5,479
Marcia has a reputation beyond reputeMarcia has a reputation beyond reputeMarcia has a reputation beyond reputeMarcia has a reputation beyond reputeMarcia has a reputation beyond reputeMarcia has a reputation beyond reputeMarcia has a reputation beyond reputeMarcia has a reputation beyond reputeMarcia has a reputation beyond reputeMarcia has a reputation beyond reputeMarcia has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Just making sure credit goes to those who found it.
No doubt many have found it, but I'd like to give credit and a word of thanks to the person who found it and then posted about it for us here at SEW.

Thanks for posting about it and sharing with us, inlogicalbearer.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:11 PM.