Special thanks to:
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Site exclusion now available in the Search Network
Heard at SES, and confirmed by AWA2 on Webmaster World:
http://www.webmasterworld.com/google...ds/3188751.htm Quote:
Finally. Melissa |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yahoo to that.. ah I mean great news Mel!
Google is forging the way once again! Now it would be interesting if they would provide some aggregate data on which sites are being blocked according to the advertiser's industry (advertisers would have to make sure their accounts are categorized properly). Since we rarely have the time to figure out exactly which publisher came from where we enter all of them into the exclusion list, plus pubs may get kicked out of YPN and Join Adsense at a later date. Should I assume G is simply using the current exclude list and applying it to their whole network? Nice Scoop Mel Discovery |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
AWR |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
That's a direct quote from Hal Bailey at SES Chicago, AWR. I wrote it down. He did say it was a recent change.
I'd love it if you could confirm or deny this! Melissa |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
First, for background, it's important to note that Hal's comment was made at a domain park panel in which he was, quite naturally, speaking on the subject of parked domains. His intended message was that any parked domain in Google's Search or Content network can be excluded. There may have been some confusion that he was referring to other sites in the search network - however, this was not his intent. Our apologies for any confusion. So, to clarify - one can exclude any site in our Content network and any parked domain in either the Search or Content network but cannot exclude other sites in the Search network. As an aside, for more information on parked domains, please see here: http://adwords.google.com/support/bi...50002&topic=82 Excerpting from that page (with italics added by me, to highlight that parked domains sites may be in either the search and content network): Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
A bit of a let down AWR
It doesn't make sense to force advertisers to run ads on sites we can clearly identify and know do not convert for us...
Many are starting to view the two ad networks in this way: Search = Google with their sheltered (from domain exclusion) high value business alliances' websites. Content = A game where advertisers try to kill bad pubs like an exterminator trying to kill cockroaches in a NY subway with a spoon. I must be pretty handy with a spoon though, because my content campaigns have been outperforming Search as of late and this is why I would like to have exclusion on the content side. I'de like to slam a few creepy crawlers over there to. Are there ways to opt out of all "parked domain sites" in one swoop? Discovery |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks for clarifying, AWR - although it is a bit disappointing to hear that we really can't exclude *any* site from Adwords.
Like Discovery said, it would be best if we could eliminate any site that wasn't converting, no matter which bucket it falls into - search, parked domain, content, whatever. Nonetheless, this is a step in the right direction and I applaud Adwords for once again being at the forefront of improvements in the PPC space. Melissa |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Perhaps this would be a good reason to not opt out of all "parked domain sites" in one swoop. I've seen more than a few reports on the forums I follow, saying that these sites convert quite well for some advertisers. ![]() Quote:
OK, lastly, I just wanted to remind everyone that (per an earlier post in the AWR's Alerts Thread) I'll be away from AdWords starting tomorrow, December 20th - and returning on January 2nd. Family calls, so I won't be reading and posting in this esteemed forum during that time. I hope you all have a wonderful holiday! Best, AWR |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
<sniff, sniff> Melissa |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
searchportal.information.com This account did not have the Content network turned on so I know all of the traffic was from the Search network. BTW, isn't that stunning? That 11% of the SEARCH traffic was from low quality, not a search engine, parked domain sites powered by a single parked domain provider. I tried both that subdomain and the top level domain, information.com, in the site exclusion tool. The garbage traffic kept coming. For some high value, exact match keywords, the garbage parked domain traffic was as high as 72% of the clicks. If that's not abnormal search click activity, I don't know what is. So far, Google is denying any click fraud and has refused to refund my client. I've been told (after numerous email conversations and phone conversations with Google support reps) that the only way to block parked domains on the Search network is to ask they be blocked and that it's a manual process. I'm scouring log files for all my clients to determine a master list of parked domain sites I don't want my clients exposed to. Right now, the list is: searchportal.information.com landing.domainsponsor.com sedoparking.com So, AdWordsRep, what's the deal? Why didn't the site exclusion tool work for searchportal.information.com? What is the definitive answer to letting AdWords advertisers buy what they think they're buying on the Search network? It's supposed to be SEARCH engine advertising. Keep the contextual stuff elsewhere. What's the procedure for blocking domain park sites on the Search network? Thanks. -Rich@Apogee (from the AdWords Help groups) |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
This is not an area of expertise for me personally, but I'll certainly chat with the folks who are more deeply involved, and see what details I can provide - either by tomorrow or early next week. (To set reasonable expectations, I will be away on Mondays (at least) for the foreseeable future, for the reason mentioned above.) Essentially, it is possible to exclude most parked domain sites using the site exclusion tool. For technical reasons, however, some sites will currently require the assistance of the AdWords support to exclude, as you have noted. I do know that work is underway to streamline the exclusion process in the future - and as always I will pass your comments along to the right folks. I already have, in fact. ![]() AWR |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
AWR, any update? My question still stands:
What's the procedure for blocking parked domain sites on the Search network? Thanks. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Anyway, yes, I actually got an answer from the team about this shortly after your intital question, but then failed to post it here. So thanks for the bump, and here's the reply I received: Quote:
AWR |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
AWR, thanks for the response. That's quite helpful.
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I did see your blog post about it, BTW (as linked to from AdWords Help) - so I knew that you had seen the response here. ![]() AWR |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Is the whole idea of site exclusion going to dissappear under the illusion that PPA will take care of click fraud/junk clicks?
PPA is opt in on the pubs part and so is CPC site targeting. What is the incentive for publishers to opt in to a program that will force them to perform? Since these new programs are opt in, are we still going to get the ability to block ANY adsense content partner not using these programs, from running our ads? Discovery |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|