|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Varying Inbound Link Destinations
The majority of linking campaigns I have reviewed always seem to have the inbound links pointing to their home page. The exceptions for the most part have been inbound links pointing to tools and articles. In today's Search Marketing Advisor, Brian Kaminski discusses best practices for link popularity. Most members of this forum already know what is written, but he makes a bonus point at the end:"Diversifying your inbound link destinations." This is a point one does not see overly discussed, and in my opinion is too often overlooked, especially for sites targetting multiple key phrases.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
That makes total sense to me. I have to say I've been guilty of inbound links to the homepage more often than not. Tools, white papers and articles certainly make sense. Varying the inbound links to pages that seem appropriate sounds like a good way to go in general.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
the home page has a tendancy to be able to rank the best since it is the recipient of many of the "natural" type of links. promoting interior pages often requires renting links and the like when it sometime may be easier to focus on getting links to the home page and letting the link popularity filter through the site.
__________________
The SEO Book |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
The man was spot on the money IMO. Inbound links as with all things need to point to all pages. It is only our laziness that tend to fail in this area. I alternate my links page ever so often. This way, when people submit to my directory for instance, so many months might have links pointing to the homepage, other months I may change the information to point to an internal page that I feel is lacking from inbound links. I do the same with my business site.
I think it is only commonsense to alternate your link locations along with your anchor text. Isn't that what linking is about? If you target a phrase, then you get a link from an authoritive content page with that anchored text pointing to the page your targeting that given phrase! IMO, you should always alternate your anchor text and location to broaden and provide stability to your entire website. Links have that affect. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have been using links to internal landing pages all along. There is always a link back to my Home Page on those pages anyway. So I feel it works out about the same.
If I have a site with multiple categorical products, then it makes sense to have the site that my link will appear on to point to one of these pages that best fits that site. I do not want that link to point to the Home Page in most cases, and then have the value of that link dispersed into other pages that do not relate to it.
__________________
I am Ronnie |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
As long as the site is structured properly the link popularity will filter up to the homepage. Keeping in mind the link is primarily for the visitors, you want them to arrive the the proper landing page. IMHO, it is not user friendly if the site visitor is required to make an extra click. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Well pointed out dodger. If I could use that reputation thing, you would off got a point from me. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've been advocating this for years. As pointed out already, it makes sense to ask for links to the most relevant resource/page. This is a lot easier way to promote links to most sites anyway.
The "side benefit" is link popularity and better rankings for interior pages, and of course spiders love to deep crawl a site that has deep links. Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I do have a bunch of links into internal pages too. I think many of those just kinda start to pop up over time. looking for people with similar content and swapping is a good call though. Even on a consultant type resource site it often makes sense to break things down. if an idea is good enough to really grow then often it is a good idea to make that idea it's own site. this way you can get all the benefits you would by promoting an inner page and also get all the bonus, perks, and benefits that a home page gets. Even for article and other resource type websites it often pays to break them down. I think my blog is WAY MORE POPULAR than it would be if I kept it on my site. A large reason many internet businesses fail (or will fail) is that they lack clear focus and they add stuff on. <random>I saw a guy who was trying to sell SEO services on his homemade hemp jewelry website. </random> Breaking ideas into their own sites can help you maintain focus on each one. After you make it to profitablility it does not cost much more money to break your ideas down into specific niche chunks. If my original site that I started just over a year ago would have been as focused as my more recent ideas I would have been profitable about a year ago ![]()
__________________
The SEO Book Last edited by seobook : 06-19-2004 at 12:03 AM. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Aaron mentioned product based sites being split out into their own seperate sites for each product category/line. That would lose your ability to cross-sell particular items that are not even related to the original purchase. Those little odds and ends that you would see at the checkstand in your grocery store.
We went with mini-sites within the site. The site is basicly a person, more than an online store though, they look for her. To have that split out across multiple sites would lose those extra sales -- it is not uncommon for people to throw in a six-pack of Burt's Bees World Famous Lip Balm with their order of some super-duper miracle supplement. This often ups those order totals an additional 15-20% -- those sales would have been lost if carried on their own site by their own.
__________________
I am Ronnie Last edited by Dodger : 06-19-2004 at 12:47 AM. Reason: atrocious spelling ... gyaaaad. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The idea I am talking about is the gaining through focus. Some sites may specialize in coffee and do well. Over time though lets say you specialized in a specific coffee + solving a users problems. Perhaps you only sell single serve coffee, but you have one of the widest varieties available on the web (http://www.podhead.com/). A site which only sells specific kind of coffee has way less competition than a site that sells everything. They may not cross sell as much, but if they can get you to associate any specific product type or packaging with them then it is far easier to remove yourself from being just another comodity selling estore.
__________________
The SEO Book |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
We're rapidly departing from the topic here, but if they aren't at least offering something else on the checkout page (coffee making tools/toys/accessories) then they are leaving money/profits on the table.
Impulse items can be offered with pretty much zero risk to finishing the sale and they can be marked up a lot more than the core product. Coffee is still a commodity, no matter where you sell it. The added profit per sale translates into higher profits per visitor, and that means you have more money for marketing. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
I hear what you are saying Aaron. My example is probably more of an unusual case to be citing anyway. There is not that wide of range in products (about 5 ... 6 if you count the stuff for pets, but that IS on a seperate site).
We do have the single sites out there that are more focused, actually they are basic three or four page single-product wonders. So we are basicly covering it from a number of angles.
__________________
I am Ronnie |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|