KPickenJr
11-15-2005, 07:40 AM
Hi, my apologies if this has been covered in a previous thread.
I work in a company with programmers and designers. SEO is a new area for my company so my clients were already customers with sites created and hosted by us. This means that when I look at a site and request changes, i am changing work already completed by the designers.
The latest site I am working on has javascript menu's. When I began learning about SEO, I thought Javascript was bad. However, some sites I have looked at have javascript links but SE's seem to like them. Knowing next to nothing about Javascript, I can only assume that it depends on how you do it, I guess you can make it search engine friendly.
My site only has the homepage indexed, so I wanted the javascript changed. Purely because, even if that's not the problem... is it really worth the hassle? And, just supposing the javascript wasn't SE friendly, would a site map with simple html links at the bottom of each page solve this (the designers argument)? In this case, to simplify it, you would have bad links at the top of the page and good links at the bottom. To me that doesn't sound right. Would the good links at the bottom cancel out any negative effects of the bad links at the top? :confused:
I'm really looking to clear this up, to hear the opinions of others in SEO, other than web designers who will obviously favour it. I realise that Javascript may not be the reason my site doesn't get good coverage, but this is an issue I will have to deal with a lot now.
Thanks
KP
I work in a company with programmers and designers. SEO is a new area for my company so my clients were already customers with sites created and hosted by us. This means that when I look at a site and request changes, i am changing work already completed by the designers.
The latest site I am working on has javascript menu's. When I began learning about SEO, I thought Javascript was bad. However, some sites I have looked at have javascript links but SE's seem to like them. Knowing next to nothing about Javascript, I can only assume that it depends on how you do it, I guess you can make it search engine friendly.
My site only has the homepage indexed, so I wanted the javascript changed. Purely because, even if that's not the problem... is it really worth the hassle? And, just supposing the javascript wasn't SE friendly, would a site map with simple html links at the bottom of each page solve this (the designers argument)? In this case, to simplify it, you would have bad links at the top of the page and good links at the bottom. To me that doesn't sound right. Would the good links at the bottom cancel out any negative effects of the bad links at the top? :confused:
I'm really looking to clear this up, to hear the opinions of others in SEO, other than web designers who will obviously favour it. I realise that Javascript may not be the reason my site doesn't get good coverage, but this is an issue I will have to deal with a lot now.
Thanks
KP