natebinzen
06-22-2005, 10:51 PM
We’re redeveloping a site, which currently does not have index.html in the root folder as its home page (home is http://www.simonesgallery.com/estore/customer/). We intended to change that, but I got the following feedback from our developer:
"As far as issue of site root is concerned, we hold it for a purpose.
When visiting the site in my browser with google toolbar installed, I noticed that most of pages have a rank of 2 or more in google.
Around 30 pages are indexed by the Google. It is good sign to site's marketing. If we change the root of site all page rank and indexed will be lost."
It sounds like he’s saying any redirecting scheme would blow away the 30 Google-indexed pages – so does that mean we’d have to manually request and get updated links from all those 30 to get back to where we were? Or will any of them pick up the change and handle it in due course? And would such manual recovery be considered a routine task in any similar redesign?
"As far as issue of site root is concerned, we hold it for a purpose.
When visiting the site in my browser with google toolbar installed, I noticed that most of pages have a rank of 2 or more in google.
Around 30 pages are indexed by the Google. It is good sign to site's marketing. If we change the root of site all page rank and indexed will be lost."
It sounds like he’s saying any redirecting scheme would blow away the 30 Google-indexed pages – so does that mean we’d have to manually request and get updated links from all those 30 to get back to where we were? Or will any of them pick up the change and handle it in due course? And would such manual recovery be considered a routine task in any similar redesign?