randfish
12-17-2004, 08:07 PM
I'm wondering if there is a good method for helping to understand what a specific search engine would consider related keywords and related phrases given a particular keyword or phrase.
As humans, we can clearly come up with ways to relate subjects, etc. But I'm wondering if one could use Google, for example, to find out which phrases or words the search engine believes to be related.
For example, would it be possible to search Google for a given keyword phrase, say "african rhino", analyze the top 50 results pages for occurences of other keyword phrases like "rhinoceros" and deduce that because "african rhino" and "rhinoceros" share all but 20 results pages, Google considers these terms related.
Could we create degrees of relativism from this, for example:
"African Rhino" 7150 results | "African Rhino" Rhinoceros 7130 results = 99.7%
"African Rhino" 7150 results | "African Rhino" Conservation 997 results = 13.9%
"African Rhino" 7150 results | "African Rhino" Hunter 1260 results = 17.6%
Do these numbers have any meaning, or am I barking up the wrong tree?
As humans, we can clearly come up with ways to relate subjects, etc. But I'm wondering if one could use Google, for example, to find out which phrases or words the search engine believes to be related.
For example, would it be possible to search Google for a given keyword phrase, say "african rhino", analyze the top 50 results pages for occurences of other keyword phrases like "rhinoceros" and deduce that because "african rhino" and "rhinoceros" share all but 20 results pages, Google considers these terms related.
Could we create degrees of relativism from this, for example:
"African Rhino" 7150 results | "African Rhino" Rhinoceros 7130 results = 99.7%
"African Rhino" 7150 results | "African Rhino" Conservation 997 results = 13.9%
"African Rhino" 7150 results | "African Rhino" Hunter 1260 results = 17.6%
Do these numbers have any meaning, or am I barking up the wrong tree?