calebw
11-16-2004, 07:51 PM
This is my first post, I've been a reader for a long time but now have a quandry which I hope the forum can assist with! :)
Here's the story:
1. I have a recently launched (in August) site that is now in top positions in Inktomi-powered engines for the query 'Mahre Training Center' (the domain name is www.mahretrainingcenter.com). However, the site appears in about 15th place in Google for the same query while other sites that are out of date and that are rougue pages with the company name appear above the official site.
2. The site is very content-heavy and contains no spam tactics. The design team is very well versed in creating sites that rank well for their topics. It is very surprising that the site is penalized in Google but ranks well, as expected, in other engines. Other sites designed by the same team rank very well, especially for their company name.
Here's the kicker... this site is hosted on a shared server that hosts several dozen other sites. Interestingly enough I have seen two other large sites on this server get demoted in Google while they retain high SERP ranks in Inktomi. I noticed the demotions after two key things:
1. A community site, www.EverythingYakima.com, jumped in rankings and then suddenly dropped for the key term "Yakima Washington". Just prior to the drops we had begun to add links to footers of a couple dozen sites we manage. All the footers had the same link text "yakima washington" and pointed to the domain. The majority of these sites are also hosted on the same server. As footer links, the links appear on every page of each site.
2. One site of a partner technology company (www.myhec.com), again hosted on the same server, added content from the EverythingYakima.com web site to its site by pulling from the content database.
Conclusions
1. It seems obvious the EverythingYakima.com web site was penalized because of the unintentional link spamming and content duplication - is this a plausable hypothesis?
2. Could Google also be penalizing other sites on the server because of association with the "bad" site via being on a shared IP?
3. Am I missing something?
Looking forward to your feedback!
-Caleb
Here's the story:
1. I have a recently launched (in August) site that is now in top positions in Inktomi-powered engines for the query 'Mahre Training Center' (the domain name is www.mahretrainingcenter.com). However, the site appears in about 15th place in Google for the same query while other sites that are out of date and that are rougue pages with the company name appear above the official site.
2. The site is very content-heavy and contains no spam tactics. The design team is very well versed in creating sites that rank well for their topics. It is very surprising that the site is penalized in Google but ranks well, as expected, in other engines. Other sites designed by the same team rank very well, especially for their company name.
Here's the kicker... this site is hosted on a shared server that hosts several dozen other sites. Interestingly enough I have seen two other large sites on this server get demoted in Google while they retain high SERP ranks in Inktomi. I noticed the demotions after two key things:
1. A community site, www.EverythingYakima.com, jumped in rankings and then suddenly dropped for the key term "Yakima Washington". Just prior to the drops we had begun to add links to footers of a couple dozen sites we manage. All the footers had the same link text "yakima washington" and pointed to the domain. The majority of these sites are also hosted on the same server. As footer links, the links appear on every page of each site.
2. One site of a partner technology company (www.myhec.com), again hosted on the same server, added content from the EverythingYakima.com web site to its site by pulling from the content database.
Conclusions
1. It seems obvious the EverythingYakima.com web site was penalized because of the unintentional link spamming and content duplication - is this a plausable hypothesis?
2. Could Google also be penalizing other sites on the server because of association with the "bad" site via being on a shared IP?
3. Am I missing something?
Looking forward to your feedback!
-Caleb