emzeegee
12-28-2006, 05:02 PM
Much of my site is ASP pages, some of which are DB driven, some of which aren't.
I recently bought the SEO administrator toolset and am happily surprised by some of its features. Their HTML Analyzing Tool has left me a little worried though.
As you know, in ASP, quotation marks around link urls or tag features can pose a problem sometimes. There are generally two alternatives.. Using \" to set apart that tag feature or simply using a ' instead.
I've been inconsistant with my usage and when I ran the HTML analyzing tool, it 'found' roughly twice as many pages in my site than I was expecting to see!
This was because it was counting
www.domain.com/index.asp and
www.domain.com/'/index.asp'
as two different pages. They both take you to the same page and work fine, but it didn't recognize them as one page. This relative link problem is affecting more than half of my major pages and I didn't realize it until now.
Two questions
Is this really even a problem? Could this be hurting my internal link structure in the eyes of the search engines?
If so, how would you recommend fixing this?
Thanks a bunch.
Marc
I recently bought the SEO administrator toolset and am happily surprised by some of its features. Their HTML Analyzing Tool has left me a little worried though.
As you know, in ASP, quotation marks around link urls or tag features can pose a problem sometimes. There are generally two alternatives.. Using \" to set apart that tag feature or simply using a ' instead.
I've been inconsistant with my usage and when I ran the HTML analyzing tool, it 'found' roughly twice as many pages in my site than I was expecting to see!
This was because it was counting
www.domain.com/index.asp and
www.domain.com/'/index.asp'
as two different pages. They both take you to the same page and work fine, but it didn't recognize them as one page. This relative link problem is affecting more than half of my major pages and I didn't realize it until now.
Two questions
Is this really even a problem? Could this be hurting my internal link structure in the eyes of the search engines?
If so, how would you recommend fixing this?
Thanks a bunch.
Marc