pdstein
06-02-2004, 11:21 AM
I don't have any problem with the idea of paid inclusion. As long as there are undefined delays to get a new site indexed or an updated site re-indexed there is going to be an incentive for people who want their sites indexed more quickly and more frequently to pay for that service. Personally, I don't see how simply paying a premium to get a site bumped up to the front of the indexing queue taints the results.
What I do have a problem with is that with Yahoo Site Match you not only have to pay to be considered but then you have to pay per click. If I wanted to pay per click there are plenty of places I can already do that. I don't want to pay per click, so I'm not going to participate in Yahoo Site Match unless they drop that requirement.
The biggest problem I see for Yahoo, though, is the fact that they mix in listings where they're getting paid per click with the unpaid results. In my mind that is a very questionable business practice and it makes me less inclined to use Yahoo for my own searching.
IMO, Yahoo could improve its reputation for relevancy and gain Site Match clients by simply dropping the PPC requirement.
What I do have a problem with is that with Yahoo Site Match you not only have to pay to be considered but then you have to pay per click. If I wanted to pay per click there are plenty of places I can already do that. I don't want to pay per click, so I'm not going to participate in Yahoo Site Match unless they drop that requirement.
The biggest problem I see for Yahoo, though, is the fact that they mix in listings where they're getting paid per click with the unpaid results. In my mind that is a very questionable business practice and it makes me less inclined to use Yahoo for my own searching.
IMO, Yahoo could improve its reputation for relevancy and gain Site Match clients by simply dropping the PPC requirement.