rustybrick
02-24-2005, 10:54 AM
It has been a struggle for Ask Jeeves, IMO, to get out of the "teoma" shadow. Ask Jeeves owns teoma, but it really doesn't need to brand teoma as the engine that powers ask jeeves. like Google and Yahoo and now MSN, it wants to be know as Ask Jeeves search.
In that interview (http://www.e-marketing-news.co.uk/Feb05/apostolos.html) I quoted now, three times in the forums, Jim from Ask said:
It is all Ask Jeeves now. As Apostolos said earlier, it was only seven people and it's now into triple digits.
I mean, regardless of the brand name out there, we're one company. Once group. Ask Jeeves is as much Teoma as Teoma is Ask Jeeves.
I have been in communication over the past month with Jim via email. He is very sensitive to the idea of Teoma, he called Teoma a "theory", which is very true. It will be very interesting to see the brand migration (if that is what you call it). I don't know how many normal searchers even heard of Teoma, but no one (except maybe Google) would want to upset the SEM industry.
In that interview (http://www.e-marketing-news.co.uk/Feb05/apostolos.html) I quoted now, three times in the forums, Jim from Ask said:
It is all Ask Jeeves now. As Apostolos said earlier, it was only seven people and it's now into triple digits.
I mean, regardless of the brand name out there, we're one company. Once group. Ask Jeeves is as much Teoma as Teoma is Ask Jeeves.
I have been in communication over the past month with Jim via email. He is very sensitive to the idea of Teoma, he called Teoma a "theory", which is very true. It will be very interesting to see the brand migration (if that is what you call it). I don't know how many normal searchers even heard of Teoma, but no one (except maybe Google) would want to upset the SEM industry.